1996 • Lada
1111 Oka
Lada 1111 Oka 0.65 (29 Hp) 1996Overall Score36.5/100
1996 Lada 1111 Oka vs 2000 Zastava Yugo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Zastava
Yugo
Zastava Yugo 0.9 (45 Hp) 2000Overall Score37.5/100
WINNER
Zastava Yugo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
36.5–37.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Lada 1111 OkaSpecificationZastava Yugo
LadaMakeZastava
1111 OkaModelYugo
1996Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors3
Performance
Lada 1111 OkaSpecificationZastava Yugo
30,0 s0–100 km/h20,1 s
120 km/hTop speed135 km/h
649 ccEngine displacement903 cc
29 HPPower45 HP
44 NmTorque63 Nm
2Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Lada 1111 OkaSpecificationZastava Yugo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank32 lt
6 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Lada 1111 OkaSpecificationZastava Yugo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
135/80 R12Tyre size135/85 R13
Dimensions
Lada 1111 OkaSpecificationZastava Yugo
3200 mmLength3490 mm
1420 mmWidth1540 mm
1400 mmHeight1340 mm
635 KgWeight750 Kg
2180 mmWheelbase2150 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Lada 1111 Oka and 2000 Zastava Yugo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Zastava Yugo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…