DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Zastava Yugo vs 1996 Lada 1111 Oka Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Zastava Yugo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

37.5–36.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZastavaMakeLada
YugoModel1111 Oka
2000Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
3Doors3

Performance

20,1 s0–100 km/h30,0 s
135 km/hTop speed120 km/h
903 ccEngine displacement649 cc
45 HPPower29 HP
63 NmTorque44 Nm
4Cylinders2

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
32 ltFuel tank30 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
135/85 R13Tyre size135/80 R12

Dimensions

3490 mmLength3200 mm
1540 mmWidth1420 mm
1340 mmHeight1400 mm
750 KgWeight635 Kg
2150 mmWheelbase2180 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Zastava Yugo and 1996 Lada 1111 Oka approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Zastava Yugo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…