1996 • Lada
1111 Oka
Lada 1111 Oka 0.65 (29 Hp) 1996Overall Score36.5/100
1996 Lada 1111 Oka vs 2001 Skoda Fabia Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2001 • Skoda
Fabia
Skoda Fabia 1.0 (50 Hp) 2001Overall Score37.5/100
WINNER
Skoda Fabia
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
36.5–37.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Lada 1111 OkaSpecificationSkoda Fabia
LadaMakeSkoda
1111 OkaModelFabia
1996Model year2001
HatchbackBody typeEstate
4Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Lada 1111 OkaSpecificationSkoda Fabia
30,0 s0–100 km/h21,6 s
120 km/hTop speed147 km/h
649 ccEngine displacement997 cc
29 HPPower50 HP
44 NmTorque84 Nm
2Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Lada 1111 OkaSpecificationSkoda Fabia
PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank45 lt
6 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
—Average consumption6,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Lada 1111 OkaSpecificationSkoda Fabia
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
135/80 R12Tyre size165/70 R14
Dimensions
Lada 1111 OkaSpecificationSkoda Fabia
3200 mmLength4220 mm
1420 mmWidth1646 mm
1400 mmHeight1452 mm
635 KgWeight1010 Kg
2180 mmWheelbase2462 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Lada 1111 Oka and 2001 Skoda Fabia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…