DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 KTM X-Bow vs 2007 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

KTM X-Bow

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

79.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KTM X-BowSpecificationMazda 6
KTMMakeMazda
X-BowModel6
2007Model year2007
RoadsterBody typeSedan
2Seats5
—Doors4

Performance

KTM X-BowSpecificationMazda 6
3,9 s0–100 km/h6,6 s
220 km/hTop speed240 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
240 HPPower260 HP
310 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

KTM X-BowSpecificationMazda 6
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption14,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,0 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

KTM X-BowSpecificationMazda 6
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
205/40 R17; 235/40 R18Tyre size215/45 R18 Y
—ABSYes

Dimensions

KTM X-BowSpecificationMazda 6
3738 mmLength4765 mm
1915 mmWidth1780 mm
1202 mmHeight1430 mm
790 KgWeight1590 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 KTM X-Bow and 2007 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…