DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Kia Sportage vs 2002 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Sportage

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeMazda
SportageModel323
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

14,7 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
172 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
128 HPPower90 HP
175 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
15,4 ltUrban consumption6,4 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/70 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4025 mmLength4200 mm
1764 mmWidth1705 mm
1650 mmHeight1410 mm
1453 KgWeight1175 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Kia Sportage and 2002 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Sportage leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…