DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mazda 323 vs 2002 Kia Sportage Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Sportage

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeKia
323ModelSportage
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

12,2 s0–100 km/h14,7 s
178 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
90 HPPower128 HP
220 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption15,4 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
—Average consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size205/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4200 mmLength4025 mm
1705 mmWidth1764 mm
1410 mmHeight1650 mm
1175 KgWeight1453 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mazda 323 and 2002 Kia Sportage approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Sportage leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…