2000 • Kia
Sportage
Kia Sportage 2.0 i 16V Wagon (128 Hp) 2000Overall Score63.25/100
2000 Kia Sportage vs 2000 Citroen XM Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Citroen
XM
Citroen XM 2.0 Turbo (147 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Kia Sportage
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia SportageSpecificationCitroen XM
KiaMakeCitroen
SportageModelXM
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Kia SportageSpecificationCitroen XM
—0–100 km/h9,3 s
172 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
128 HPPower147 HP
175 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia SportageSpecificationCitroen XM
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank80 lt
14,6 ltUrban consumption14,5 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia SportageSpecificationCitroen XM
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/70 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia SportageSpecificationCitroen XM
4435 mmLength4708 mm
1764 mmWidth1794 mm
1695 mmHeight1394 mm
1505 KgWeight1401 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Kia Sportage and 2000 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Sportage leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…