DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Citroen XM vs 2000 Kia Sportage Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Sportage

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeKia
XMModelSportage
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h—
215 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
147 HPPower128 HP
235 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank65 lt
14,5 ltUrban consumption14,6 lt
8,0 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size205/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4708 mmLength4435 mm
1794 mmWidth1764 mm
1394 mmHeight1695 mm
1401 KgWeight1505 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Citroen XM and 2000 Kia Sportage approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Sportage leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…