DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2004 Kia Shuma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Shuma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeKia
LancerModelShuma
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,6 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
181 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1584 ccEngine displacement1594 cc
98 HPPower101 HP
150 NmTorque144 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4485 mmLength4525 mm
1695 mmWidth1720 mm
1480 mmHeight1415 mm
1360 KgWeight1115 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2560 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2004 Kia Shuma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Shuma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…