DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Kia Shuma vs 2000 Toyota Paseo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Paseo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeToyota
ShumaModelPaseo
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
180 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
88 HPPower90 HP
135 NmTorque130 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption—
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60R14Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4475 mmLength4160 mm
1711 mmWidth1660 mm
1427 mmHeight1290 mm
1100 KgWeight995 Kg
2560 mmWheelbase2380 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Kia Shuma and 2000 Toyota Paseo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Paseo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…