DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Kia Sephia vs 1999 Kia Shuma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Sephia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Kia SephiaSpecificationKia Shuma
KiaMakeKia
SephiaModelShuma
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Kia SephiaSpecificationKia Shuma
11,8 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
88 HPPower88 HP
135 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Kia SephiaSpecificationKia Shuma
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Kia SephiaSpecificationKia Shuma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/60R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Kia SephiaSpecificationKia Shuma
4427 mmLength4475 mm
1711 mmWidth1711 mm
1415 mmHeight1427 mm
1065 KgWeight1100 Kg
2560 mmWheelbase2560 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Kia Sephia and 1999 Kia Shuma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Sephia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…