DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Kia Shuma vs 2000 Kia Sephia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Sephia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Kia ShumaSpecificationKia Sephia
KiaMakeKia
ShumaModelSephia
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Kia ShumaSpecificationKia Sephia
11,8 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
88 HPPower88 HP
135 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Kia ShumaSpecificationKia Sephia
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Kia ShumaSpecificationKia Sephia
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Kia ShumaSpecificationKia Sephia
4475 mmLength4427 mm
1711 mmWidth1711 mm
1427 mmHeight1415 mm
1100 KgWeight1065 Kg
2560 mmWheelbase2560 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Kia Shuma and 2000 Kia Sephia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Sephia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…