DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Kia Rio vs 2003 Citroen Xsara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Rio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeCitroen
RioModelXsara
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,3 s0–100 km/h16,7 s
165 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1343 ccEngine displacement1399 cc
82 HPPower68 HP
116 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank54 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
—Average consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4240 mmLength4167 mm
1680 mmWidth1698 mm
1440 mmHeight1405 mm
1000 KgWeight1120 Kg
2410 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Kia Rio and 2003 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Rio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…