DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Citroen Xsara vs 2003 Kia Rio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Rio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeKia
XsaraModelRio
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

16,7 s0–100 km/h14,3 s
164 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1399 ccEngine displacement1343 cc
68 HPPower82 HP
150 NmTorque116 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4167 mmLength4240 mm
1698 mmWidth1680 mm
1405 mmHeight1440 mm
1120 KgWeight1000 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2410 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Citroen Xsara and 2003 Kia Rio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Rio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…