2000 • Kia
Retona
Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V (136 Hp) 2000Overall Score63.25/100
2000 Kia Retona vs 2000 Toyota Camry Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Toyota
Camry
Toyota Camry 2.2 (136 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Kia Retona
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia RetonaSpecificationToyota Camry
KiaMakeToyota
RetonaModelCamry
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
Kia RetonaSpecificationToyota Camry
150 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2164 cc
136 HPPower136 HP
181 NmTorque203 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia RetonaSpecificationToyota Camry
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
16 ltUrban consumption10,2 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia RetonaSpecificationToyota Camry
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia RetonaSpecificationToyota Camry
4000 mmLength4788 mm
1745 mmWidth1780 mm
1835 mmHeight1407 mm
1480 KgWeight1360 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2672 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Kia Retona and 2000 Toyota Camry approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…