DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Megane vs 2000 Kia Retona Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Retona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeKia
MeganeModelRetona
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
140 HPPower136 HP
200 NmTorque181 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption16 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
7,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/50 R16Tyre size215/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4082 mmLength4000 mm
1698 mmWidth1745 mm
1368 mmHeight1835 mm
1200 KgWeight1480 Kg
2468 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Megane and 2000 Kia Retona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…