DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Kia Optima vs 2001 Chrysler Concorde Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeChrysler
OptimaModelConcorde
2001Model year2001
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,8 s
0 km/hTop speed187 km/h
2656 ccEngine displacement2736 cc
181 HPPower203 HP
245 NmTorque258 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption11,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/60 R15Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4722 mmLength5310 mm
1815 mmWidth1900 mm
1410 mmHeight1420 mm
1447 KgWeight1570 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Kia Optima and 2001 Chrysler Concorde approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…