DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Chrysler Concorde vs 2001 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeKia
ConcordeModelOptima
2001Model year2001
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h—
187 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2736 ccEngine displacement2656 cc
203 HPPower181 HP
258 NmTorque245 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank65 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption—
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5310 mmLength4722 mm
1900 mmWidth1815 mm
1420 mmHeight1410 mm
1570 KgWeight1447 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Chrysler Concorde and 2001 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…