DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Kia Optima vs 2005 Volvo S60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Kia OptimaSpecificationVolvo S60
KiaMakeVolvo
OptimaModelS60
2005Model year2005
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Kia OptimaSpecificationVolvo S60
—0–100 km/h8,2 s
209 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2494 ccEngine displacement2401 cc
176 HPPower185 HP
229 NmTorque400 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Kia OptimaSpecificationVolvo S60
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption8,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Kia OptimaSpecificationVolvo S60
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
205/60 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Kia OptimaSpecificationVolvo S60
4745 mmLength4576 mm
1815 mmWidth1804 mm
1420 mmHeight1428 mm
1450 KgWeight1535 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2715 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Kia Optima and 2005 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…