DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Volvo S60 vs 2005 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S60SpecificationKia Optima
VolvoMakeKia
S60ModelOptima
2005Model year2005
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Volvo S60SpecificationKia Optima
8,2 s0–100 km/h—
230 km/hTop speed209 km/h
2401 ccEngine displacement2494 cc
185 HPPower176 HP
400 NmTorque229 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S60SpecificationKia Optima
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank65 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption—
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S60SpecificationKia Optima
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
205/55 R16Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S60SpecificationKia Optima
4576 mmLength4745 mm
1804 mmWidth1815 mm
1428 mmHeight1420 mm
1535 KgWeight1450 Kg
2715 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Volvo S60 and 2005 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…