2004 • BMW
X3
BMW X3 2.5i (192 Hp) 2004Overall Score70.5/100
2004 BMW X3 vs 2004 Kia Optima Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.5 V6 (176 Hp) 2004Overall Score71.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
70.5–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
BMW X3SpecificationKia Optima
BMWMakeKia
X3ModelOptima
2004Model year2004
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
BMW X3SpecificationKia Optima
8,9 s0–100 km/h—
208 km/hTop speed209 km/h
2494 ccEngine displacement2494 cc
192 HPPower176 HP
245 NmTorque229 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
BMW X3SpecificationKia Optima
PetrolFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank65 lt
15,6 ltUrban consumption—
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
BMW X3SpecificationKia Optima
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
235/55 R17Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
BMW X3SpecificationKia Optima
4569 mmLength4745 mm
1853 mmWidth1815 mm
1674 mmHeight1420 mm
1815 KgWeight1450 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 BMW X3 and 2004 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…