DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Kia Optima vs 2004 Jaguar X-type Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

71.5–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeJaguar
OptimaModelX-type
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,3 s
209 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2494 ccEngine displacement2495 cc
176 HPPower196 HP
229 NmTorque241 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption13,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,2 lt
—Average consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4745 mmLength4672 mm
1815 mmWidth1789 mm
1420 mmHeight1430 mm
1450 KgWeight1570 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2710 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Kia Optima and 2004 Jaguar X-type approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…