DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Kia Optima vs 2001 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeOpel
OptimaModelOmega
2001Model year2001
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,0 s
0 km/hTop speed206 km/h
2494 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
172 HPPower150 HP
229 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption11,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
—Average consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/70 R14; 205/60 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4722 mmLength4898 mm
1815 mmWidth1775 mm
1410 mmHeight1450 mm
1495 KgWeight1610 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Kia Optima and 2001 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…