DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Opel Omega vs 2001 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeKia
OmegaModelOptima
2001Model year2001
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h—
206 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2494 cc
150 HPPower172 HP
300 NmTorque229 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank65 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size195/70 R14; 205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4898 mmLength4722 mm
1775 mmWidth1815 mm
1450 mmHeight1410 mm
1610 KgWeight1495 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Opel Omega and 2001 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…