2002 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.5 V6 (169 Hp) 2002Overall Score65.5/100
2002 Kia Optima vs 2002 Opel Omega Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.5 V6 TDI (150 Hp) 2002Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationOpel Omega
KiaMakeOpel
OptimaModelOmega
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationOpel Omega
8,5 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
214 km/hTop speed206 km/h
2493 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
169 HPPower150 HP
230 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationOpel Omega
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank75 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption11,9 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
9,2 ltAverage consumption8,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationOpel Omega
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/70 R14; 205/60 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationOpel Omega
4745 mmLength4898 mm
1815 mmWidth1775 mm
1420 mmHeight1450 mm
1480 KgWeight1610 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Kia Optima and 2002 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…