2002 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.5 V6 TDI (150 Hp) 2002Overall Score64.75/100
2002 Opel Omega vs 2002 Kia Optima Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.5 V6 (169 Hp) 2002Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationKia Optima
OpelMakeKia
OmegaModelOptima
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationKia Optima
11,0 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
206 km/hTop speed214 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2493 cc
150 HPPower169 HP
300 NmTorque230 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationKia Optima
DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank65 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption13,6 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption9,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationKia Optima
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size195/70 R14; 205/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationKia Optima
4898 mmLength4745 mm
1775 mmWidth1815 mm
1450 mmHeight1420 mm
1610 KgWeight1480 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Opel Omega and 2002 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…