DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Kia Optima vs 2000 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeLand Rover
OptimaModelFreelander
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
214 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2493 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
169 HPPower177 HP
230 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption17,2 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,7 lt
9,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
195/70 R14; 205/60 R15Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4745 mmLength4433 mm
1815 mmWidth1809 mm
1420 mmHeight1709 mm
1480 KgWeight1550 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Kia Optima and 2000 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…