DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mercedes-Benz ML vs 2000 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mercedes-BenzMakeKia
MLModelOptima
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
177 km/hTop speed214 km/h
2295 ccEngine displacement2493 cc
150 HPPower169 HP
220 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank65 lt
17,8 ltUrban consumption13,6 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
12,8 ltAverage consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/75 R16Tyre size195/70 R14; 205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4587 mmLength4745 mm
1833 mmWidth1815 mm
1802 mmHeight1420 mm
1855 KgWeight1480 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mercedes-Benz ML and 2000 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…