DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Kia Optima vs 2012 Honda Accord Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeHonda
OptimaModelAccord
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
210 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2359 ccEngine displacement2199 cc
201 HPPower180 HP
245 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank65 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 R18Tyre size235/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4845 mmLength4725 mm
1830 mmWidth1840 mm
1455 mmHeight1440 mm
1476 KgWeight1575 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2705 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Kia Optima and 2012 Honda Accord approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…