DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Honda Accord vs 2012 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeKia
AccordModelOptima
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
220 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2199 ccEngine displacement2359 cc
180 HPPower201 HP
380 NmTorque245 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/40 R18Tyre size225/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4725 mmLength4845 mm
1840 mmWidth1830 mm
1440 mmHeight1455 mm
1575 KgWeight1476 Kg
2705 mmWheelbase2795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Honda Accord and 2012 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…