2011 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.4 CVVT (180 Hp) 2011Overall Score68.5/100
2011 Kia Optima vs 2011 Volvo C30 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2011 • Volvo
C30
Volvo C30 2.0 D4 (177 Hp) 2011Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationVolvo C30
KiaMakeVolvo
OptimaModelC30
2011Model year2011
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationVolvo C30
9,1 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
210 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2359 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
180 HPPower177 HP
231 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationVolvo C30
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption7,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,0 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationVolvo C30
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/65 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationVolvo C30
4845 mmLength4266 mm
1830 mmWidth1782 mm
1455 mmHeight1447 mm
1428 KgWeight1451 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Kia Optima and 2011 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…