DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Chevrolet Cavalier vs 2003 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Cavalier

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeKia
CavalierModelOptima
2003Model year2003
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement2351 cc
141 HPPower140 HP
203 NmTorque199 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
53 ltFuel tank65 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption—
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4580 mmLength4719 mm
1712 mmWidth1815 mm
1351 mmHeight1410 mm
1215 KgWeight1488 Kg
2645 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Chevrolet Cavalier and 2003 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Cavalier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…