DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Kia Optima vs 2003 Ford Focus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Focus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeFord
OptimaModelFocus
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,8 s
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
140 HPPower147 HP
199 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank53 lt
—Urban consumption10,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4719 mmLength4450 mm
1815 mmWidth1699 mm
1410 mmHeight1430 mm
1488 KgWeight1315 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Kia Optima and 2003 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…