DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Kia Optima vs 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Cavalier

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeChevrolet
OptimaModelCavalier
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,0 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
140 HPPower141 HP
199 NmTorque203 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank53 lt
—Urban consumption9,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,1 lt
—Average consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4719 mmLength4580 mm
1815 mmWidth1712 mm
1410 mmHeight1351 mm
1488 KgWeight1215 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2645 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Kia Optima and 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Cavalier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…