2013 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0i 16V Hybrid (177 Hp) 2013Overall Score63.25/100
2013 Kia Optima vs 2013 Toyota RAV4 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Toyota
RAV4
Toyota RAV4 2.0 D-4D (124 Hp) 2013Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationToyota RAV4
KiaMakeToyota
OptimaModelRAV4
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationToyota RAV4
9,4 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
190 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower124 HP
180 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationToyota RAV4
Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationToyota RAV4
4845 mmLength4570 mm
1830 mmWidth1845 mm
1455 mmHeight1660 mm
1587-1648 KgWeight—
2795 mmWheelbase2660 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Kia Optima and 2013 Toyota RAV4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…