DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Kia Optima vs 2013 Opel Zafira Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeOpel
OptimaModelZafira
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeMPV
5Seats5/7
4Doors5

Performance

9,4 s0–100 km/h11,4 s
190 km/hTop speed191 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
150 HPPower130 HP
180 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank58 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4845 mmLength4656 mm
1830 mmWidth1884 mm
1455 mmHeight1685 mm
1587-1648 KgWeight—
2795 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Kia Optima and 2013 Opel Zafira approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…