2013 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0i 16V Hybrid (177 Hp) 2013Overall Score63.25/100
2013 Kia Optima vs 2013 Mazda 3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 2.0 DISI (150 Hp) 2013Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationMazda 3
KiaMakeMazda
OptimaModel3
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationMazda 3
9,4 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
190 km/hTop speed206 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
180 NmTorque191 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationMazda 3
Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationMazda 3
4845 mmLength4460 mm
1830 mmWidth1755 mm
1455 mmHeight1470 mm
1587-1648 KgWeight1280 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Kia Optima and 2013 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…