2013 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0i 16V Hybrid (177 Hp) 2013Overall Score63.25/100
2013 Kia Optima vs 2013 Lincoln MKZ Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Lincoln
MKZ
Lincoln MKZ 2.0 (188 Hp) 2013Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationLincoln MKZ
KiaMakeLincoln
OptimaModelMKZ
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationLincoln MKZ
9,4 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
150 HPPower141 HP
180 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationLincoln MKZ
Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
65 ltFuel tank51 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption—
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationLincoln MKZ
4845 mmLength4930 mm
1830 mmWidth1864 mm
1455 mmHeight1476 mm
1587-1648 KgWeight1746 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Kia Optima and 2013 Lincoln MKZ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…