2013 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0i 16V Hybrid (177 Hp) 2013Overall Score63.25/100
2013 Kia Optima vs 2013 Jeep Compass Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Jeep
Compass
Jeep Compass 2.2 CRD (136 Hp) 2013Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationJeep Compass
KiaMakeJeep
OptimaModelCompass
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationJeep Compass
9,4 s0–100 km/h10,90 s
190 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement2143 cc
150 HPPower136 HP
180 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationJeep Compass
Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank51 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption7,40 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,40 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption6,10 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationJeep Compass
4845 mmLength4448 mm
1830 mmWidth1812 mm
1455 mmHeight1718 mm
1587-1648 KgWeight1634 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2635 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Kia Optima and 2013 Jeep Compass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…