2013 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0i 16V Hybrid (177 Hp) 2013Overall Score63.25/100
2013 Kia Optima vs 2013 Great Wall Deer Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Great Wall
Deer
Great Wall Deer 2.2 i (105 Hp) 2013Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationGreat Wall Deer
KiaMakeGreat Wall
OptimaModelDeer
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationGreat Wall Deer
9,4 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement2237 cc
150 HPPower105 HP
180 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationGreat Wall Deer
Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption11,8 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption14 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationGreat Wall Deer
4845 mmLength4870 mm
1830 mmWidth1750 mm
1455 mmHeight1800 mm
1587-1648 KgWeight1575 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Kia Optima and 2013 Great Wall Deer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…