2013 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0i 16V Hybrid (177 Hp) 2013Overall Score63.25/100
2013 Kia Optima vs 2013 Ford Focus Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 2.0 TDCi (115 Hp) 2013Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationFord Focus
KiaMakeFord
OptimaModelFocus
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationFord Focus
9,4 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
190 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
150 HPPower115 HP
180 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationFord Focus
Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationFord Focus
—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16; 205/55 R16; 215/55 R16; 215/50 R17; 235/40 R18
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationFord Focus
4845 mmLength4556 mm
1830 mmWidth1823 mm
1455 mmHeight1505 mm
1587-1648 KgWeight1471 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2648 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Kia Optima and 2013 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…