2013 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0i 16V Hybrid (177 Hp) 2013Overall Score63.25/100
2013 Kia Optima vs 2013 Chevrolet Tavera Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Chevrolet
Tavera
Chevrolet Tavera 2.2i (117 Hp) 2013Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationChevrolet Tavera
KiaMakeChevrolet
OptimaModelTavera
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationChevrolet Tavera
9,4 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement2190 cc
150 HPPower117 HP
180 NmTorque183 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationChevrolet Tavera
Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank0 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationChevrolet Tavera
4845 mmLength—
1830 mmWidth—
1455 mmHeight—
1587-1648 KgWeight—
2795 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Kia Optima and 2013 Chevrolet Tavera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…