2004 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0i 16V (136 Hp) 2004Overall Score56.5/100
2004 Kia Optima vs 2005 Lancia Phedra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Lancia
Phedra
Lancia Phedra 2.0 16V (136 Hp) 2005Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Lancia Phedra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationLancia Phedra
KiaMakeLancia
OptimaModelPhedra
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
4Doors5
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationLancia Phedra
11,5 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
207 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
136 HPPower136 HP
181 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationLancia Phedra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank80 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption12,3 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption9,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationLancia Phedra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/70 R14; 205/60 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationLancia Phedra
4720 mmLength4750 mm
1815 mmWidth1863 mm
1410 mmHeight1760 mm
1415-1496 KgWeight1575 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2825 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Kia Optima and 2005 Lancia Phedra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Lancia Phedra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…