DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Daewoo Evanda vs 2004 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Evanda

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakeKia
EvandaModelOptima
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
199 km/hTop speed207 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
131 HPPower136 HP
181 NmTorque181 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank65 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption12,6 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
8,8 ltAverage consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size195/70 R14; 205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4770 mmLength4720 mm
1815 mmWidth1815 mm
1440 mmHeight1410 mm
1470 KgWeight1415-1496 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Daewoo Evanda and 2004 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Evanda leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…