DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Kia Optima vs 2016 Volvo S90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.75–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Kia OptimaSpecificationVolvo S90
KiaMakeVolvo
OptimaModelS90
2014Model year2016
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Kia OptimaSpecificationVolvo S90
—0–100 km/h5,8 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
278 HPPower320 HP
365 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Kia OptimaSpecificationVolvo S90
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Average consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Kia OptimaSpecificationVolvo S90
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/45 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Kia OptimaSpecificationVolvo S90
4845 mmLength4963 mm
1830 mmWidth1879 mm
1455 mmHeight1443 mm
1573 KgWeight—
2795 mmWheelbase2941 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Kia Optima and 2016 Volvo S90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…