DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 KTM X-Bow vs 2014 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

KTM X-Bow

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

79.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KTM X-BowSpecificationKia Optima
KTMMakeKia
X-BowModelOptima
2014Model year2014
RoadsterBody typeSedan
2Seats5
—Doors4

Performance

KTM X-BowSpecificationKia Optima
3,9 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
240 HPPower278 HP
310 NmTorque365 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

KTM X-BowSpecificationKia Optima
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

KTM X-BowSpecificationKia Optima
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/40 R17; 235/40 R18Tyre size225/45 R18
—ABSYes

Dimensions

KTM X-BowSpecificationKia Optima
3738 mmLength4845 mm
1915 mmWidth1830 mm
1202 mmHeight1455 mm
790 KgWeight1573 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 KTM X-Bow and 2014 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…