2017 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0 GDI (202 Hp) 2017Overall Score67.5/100
2017 Kia Optima vs 2017 Mazda CX-5 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Mazda
CX-5
Mazda CX-5 2.0i (165 Hp) 2017Overall Score68.25/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-5
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationMazda CX-5
KiaMakeMazda
OptimaModelCX-5
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationMazda CX-5
—0–100 km/h9,2 s
0 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
154 HPPower165 HP
189 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationMazda CX-5
Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank56 lt
—Urban consumption7,5 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
1,33 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationMazda CX-5
4855 mmLength4555 mm
1860 mmWidth1840 mm
1465 mmHeight1710 mm
1780-1880 KgWeight1315 Kg
2805 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Kia Optima and 2017 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSMitsubishi Outlander vs Kia Optima2017 and 2017 model yearsImage unavailableVSFAW Besturn X80 vs Kia Optima2017 and 2017 model yearsImage unavailableVSMazda CX-5 vs Kia Optima2017 and 2017 model yearsImage unavailableVSChery Tiggo 5 vs Kia Optima2017 and 2017 model yearsImage unavailableVSMG MG6 vs Kia Optima2017 and 2017 model yearsComments are loading…