DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 FAW Besturn X80 vs 2017 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW Besturn X80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAWMakeKia
Besturn X80ModelOptima
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
147 HPPower154 HP
184 NmTorque189 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
58 ltFuel tank0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt
—Average consumption1,33 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
6Gears—
215/60 R17Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4586 mmLength4855 mm
1820 mmWidth1860 mm
1695 mmHeight1465 mm
1500 KgWeight1780-1880 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2805 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 FAW Besturn X80 and 2017 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW Besturn X80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…