DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Mazda CX-5 vs 2014 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeKia
CX-5ModelOptima
2014Model year2014
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
197 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
160 HPPower165 HP
208 NmTorque196 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4555 mmLength4845 mm
1840 mmWidth1830 mm
1710 mmHeight1455 mm
1488 KgWeight1500 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Mazda CX-5 and 2014 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…