DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Kia Optima vs 2014 Landwind X5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Landwind X5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeLandwind
OptimaModelX5
2014Model year2014
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
202 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
165 HPPower190 HP
196 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,9 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/55 R17Tyre size225/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4845 mmLength4568 mm
1830 mmWidth1855 mm
1455 mmHeight1710 mm
1500 KgWeight1580 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Kia Optima and 2014 Landwind X5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Landwind X5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…